SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 2193

NISHA GUPTA
Dr. B. S. Tomar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Anurag Sharma, Advocate.
For the State: Laxman Meena, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - This Misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of the FIR No. 239/2013 registered at Police Station Chandawaji,Jaipur for the offences under Sections 354A,354D and 370 IPC.

2. After lodging of the FIR, with the efforts of well-wishers of both the parties arrived to an amicable settlement. The dispute which has been narrated in the FIR can be brought to an end through composition of the offence, hence the prayer of the petitioners is that FIR quashed.

3. Both the parties have filed an agreement deed which was verified by the Deputy Registrar (Judl.).

4. The only contention of the present petitioners is that the matter has been compromised between the parties and hence the FIR should be quashed and reliance has been placed on Jagdish Chanana & Ors v. State Of Haryana & Anr., JT 2008 (4) SC 511 . wherein it was held:

"The fact that a compromise has indeed been recorded is admitted by all sides and in terms of the compromise the disputes which are purely personal in nature and arise out of commercial transactions, have been settled in terms of the compromise with one of the terms of the compromise being that proceedings pending in court may be withd












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top