SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 764

AMITAVA ROY, VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Rajkumar alias Kara – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Pradeep Mathur, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard Mr.Pradeep Mathur, learned counsel for the appellant/writ petitioner.

2. The appellant/writ petitioner had instituted S.B.Criminal Writ Petition No.73/2013 assailing the judgment and order dated 15.10.2013 passed by the court of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Jaipur South in case No.15/2011 directing his externment from the limits of Jaipur for a period of three months, in exercise of powers under the Rajasthan Control of Goondas Act, 1975 (for short, hereafter referred to as 'the Act'). By the impugned judgment and order, the challenge has been negated.

3. The pleaded case of the appellant/writ petitioner, in short, is that he is a resident of Mansarovar, Jaipur (South). The SHO, Police Station, Mansarovar, Jaipur (South) filed a complaint No.12130 dated 29.9.2010 before the District Collector, Jaipur, which was eventually registered as case No.15/2011 and laid before the court of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Jaipur (South) for adjudication. It was alleged in the complaint that the appellant/writ petitioner was a habitual offender indulging in gambling, business of illegal liquor, assaults, abduction, robbery and murder since 1993, for which, he had bee










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top