2014 Supreme(Raj) 865
ARUN BHANSALI
Narendrasingh Bhati LRs – Appellant
Versus
Fatehsingh LRs – Respondent
For the Appellant:N.S. Charan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:M.R. Singhvi, Sr. Adv., Sandeep Shah and Muktesh Maheshwari, Advocates.
JUDGMENT
1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties on application filed by respondent No. 6 seeking transposition as appellant in the present appeal.
2. It is, inter alia, indicated in the application that before the trial court the applicant was impleaded in the suit as legal representative of deceased Narendrasingh Bhati, who was plaintiff along with her brother and sister; while the present appeal has been filed by one of the sisters another appeal being S.B. Civil First Appeal No.349/2013 has been filed by the brother, and the interest of legal representative of respondent No.6 and the appellant are common and same; it would be just, proper and in the interest of justice that the applicant be transposed as appellant in the present appeal and the rights and interest of the other parties to the appeal are not going to be adversely affected in any manner.
3. Though, a reply to the application has been filed by the appellant, inter alia, indicating that without prejudice to her legal right and interest with the respondent No.6, the appellant does not have any objection to the impleadment and her transposition as a co-appellant.
4. A reply has been filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 4,
Click Here to Read the rest of this document