SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Raj) 2213

K.S.RATHORE
Ghansyam – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Accused Appellants:Ali Mohd. Khan, Advocate.
For the UOI: Laxman Madnani, Special P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. - The present criminal appeal is directed against the judgment dated. 17.01.2003 passed by the Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Jhalawar, whereby the accused-appellants have been convicted under Section 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act,1985(for short 'the Act of') and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for years with a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- each, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for three years.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that complainant Shri Niranjan Guru, C.I., Narcotics Department received a Mukhabir information on 12.01.2001 to the effect that the above accused appellants are seating at Gilani Tiraha at Panchayat Bhawa. The complainant asked the name of the appellants and as per the Department's case complainant recovered contraband articles from the possession of the accused-appellants and lodged a written report on 12.01.2001.

3. On the basis of the above information, CNB registered a case and investigation commenced. After completion of the investigation, charge-sheet was filed and the case was committed for trial. The trial Court framed charge under Section 8/18 of the NDPS Act agai













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top