2011 Supreme(Raj) 2344
MEENA V.GOMBER
Hanuman Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Complaint Petitioner:Anoop Dhand, Advocate.
For the Accused Petitioner: None present.
For the State:Piyush Kumar, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - This criminal misc. Petition ha d been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., jointly by the accused persons and the complainant against the order dated 1.6.2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Laxmangarh (Sikar) in Criminal Case No.501/2007, whereby the application filed by the petitioners for attestation of compromise and dropping of proceedings of the criminal case for offence under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC, had been rejected.
2. Perused the impugned order.
3. Vide order dated 1.6.2009 the learned trial court attested the compromise for offence under Section 420 IPC but the rest of the offences being non compoundable, the prayer was dismissed.
4. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that when the parties have amicably settled their dispute out of court, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the matter alive for trial.
5. On the other hand learned Public Prosecutor contends that the offences being non compoundable, the trial court rightly rejected the application and, therefore, the order of the trial court does not warrant any interference by this court.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the matter of Madan Mohan Abbot v. State
Click Here to Read the rest of this document