SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 2824

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
R.S.Chauhan, J.
Ganesh @ Kaniya - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal (Jail) Appeal No. 320 of 2008.
Decided On : 23-12-2011

Advocates:
For the Appellant:Ravi Kasliwal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Javed Chaudhary, PP.

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860 – S. 376, 366 and 366A Rape conviction and sentence – appealed against – held, PW4 (prosecutrix mother) explained delay in filing statement – held unacceptable – PW4 sleeping at railway station the night prosecutrix went missing was unnatural behavior – though no denying her truth of being poor, illiterate and that night being mentally and physically exhausted – unshakeable testimony given by PW4 in cross examination – small inconsistency cannot influence minor prosecutrix testimony – mere penetration enough to establish rape – prosecutrix hymen found intact – hence not subjected to slight penetration – false implication cannot be accepted that prosecutrix parents PW4 and PW5 owed Rs. 10,000 to appellant – impugned order upheld – appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

1. - Having been convicted of offence under Section 376,366,366A IPC and for offence under Section 3(1)(xii) of the SC/St (Prevention of Atrocities Act, the appellant has approached this court.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that on 13.08.2005, the office of the Superintendent, District Ajmer received a letter sent by Satyapal (RW.5) wherein he claimed that on 01.08.2005 around 8:00 PM his wife, Smt. Geeta (RW.4), had taken their daughter, Kumari Seema (P.W.1), to a Shiv Temple, near the Madar Gate at Ajmer. After coming out of the temple, his wife and their daughter were standing near thd Badri Sweetmeat shop. While they were standing there. Ganesh (the appellant before this Court) and one Santosh were standing near them. Their daughter went to a water hut (Paiyo). However, the child never came back. Therefore, his wife searched for the child. She found that both Ganesh and Santosh were missing from that area. He further alleged that on 02.02.2005, a girl called Jassi, who sells almonds and cashew nuts near the Post Office Ajmer, told them that if they were to go to the Lohar Basti, near the Alwar Gate, they would be able to find their daughter. Consequently, his wife went to the Lohar Basti. There, she was told at night a girl had come in their neighbourhood. But, the child is no longer there. She was also informed that Ganesh is also missing. He further claimed that on 02.08.2005, his wife went to the Police Station situated at Clock Tower for filing a report. However, she was told to go to Police Station Kotwali. When she went to the Police Station Kotwali, she was sent back to the Police Station Clock Tower ostensibly on the ground that her daughter had disappeared form the Madar Gate, which fell within the jurisdiction of Police Station Clock Tower. When she went back to the police station Clock Tower, she was told to report to the Police Station Madar Gate. Eventually, when she reached Police Station Madar Gate, the police refused to record the FIR and dismissed her. He further alleged that since 1997, one Arjun has been threatening that he will either kidnap his wife, or his daughter. Furthermore, he claimed that on 05.08.2005, his wife had filed an application under Section 97 Cr.PC., for the production of their child, as she was conviced that Ganesh, Santosh and Arjun have Kidnapped their daughter and were illegally detaining her. His wife further apprehended that their daughter could be sold into the flesh trade. Upon this information, the learned Additional District Magistrate issued a search warrant against Ganesh and Santosh. The police informed the complainant that they will try to locate the child in the night of 5th August, 2005 and they should reach the police station on 6th August, 2005. They reported to the police station and went with the police party to Lohar Basti. Initially, the people of Lohar Basti fought with the complainant. But subsequently, told him that his daughter is being kept near the Railway Station, clock Tower, He further alleged that on 06.08.2005, around 11:00 AM, the child came back home. The child informed his wife that on 01.08.2005 when she had gone to the water hut, she had gone to ease herself. The child also told her mother that while she was easing herself, Ganesh had kidnapped her at the point of a knife. He forced her to have a cup of tea. After drinking the tea, she became unconscious. He took her to the Lohar Basti. When she became conscious in the morning of 2nd August, 2005, she found her clothes were missing; she realised that she had been ravished by Ganesh Lohar. She further claimed that Ganeshs sister, Smt. Kamla, got them a room. Even in the room, he forced her to have a cup of tea. She became unconscious; again she was ravished by him. She further told her mother that on 04.03.2005, a dispute arose between Ganesh and his sister Smt. Kamla. His sister told him to take the girl back to Ajmer. On Friday, she was placed on a train for sending her back to Aj



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top