SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 1852

H.R.PANWAR
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:G.K. Vyas, Advocate.
For the State: Anil Upadhyay, P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. - By this criminal miscellaneous petition moved under Section 482, Cr.P.C. petitioner Ramesh Kumar has challenged the finding recorded by the learned Chief Judl. Magistrate, Jodhpur in Criminal Case No. 118/93 whereby, in para 16 of the judgment, the trial Court took cognizance under Section 344(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the petitioner for making false statement on oath before the Court in criminal trial conducted against accused Naresh Singh and Smt. Rajbala. The petitioner was examined in the trial as D.W. 2.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the order impugned. I have also carefully gone through the statement of petitioner Ramesh Kumar recorded by the trial Court.

3. The petitioner has proved certain memos prepared by the Food Inspector at the time of taking sample from the shop of accused Naresh Singh and Smt. Rajbala. The petitioner has admitted his signatures on the various memos viz., Ex.. 8, Ex. 9, Ex. 10 and Ex. 12 vide which sample was taken by the Food Inspector, PW. 1. PC. Harsh. It appears that on certain points this witness (petitioner herein) failed to support the prosec




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top