Murari Lal vs State of Rajasthan - 2001 Supreme(Raj) 1743

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1743

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, KHEM CHAND SHARMA
Murari Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

For the Appellants:S.R. Bajwa, Senior Advocate with Jitendra Pandey, Advocates.
For the State: Rajendra Yadav, Public Prosecutor.
For the Complainant:Biri Singh and Harendra Singh, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

1. - The appellants were indicted before the learned Special Judge cum Additional Sessions Judge Dholpur in Sessions Case No. 21/90. They were found guilty, convicted and sentenced vide judgment dated August 21, 1995 by the learned judge as under-

1. Murari Lal	u/s 302/149 I.P.C.	to undergo imprisonment, for life and fine of Rs. 200/- in default to further undergo three months Rl.
2. Badri s/o Shiv Singh
3. Badri s/o Bhagwan Singh
4. Munshi Lal
	u/s 148 I.P.C.	to undergo three months Rl
	u/s 201 I.P.C.	to undergo three years Rl and fine of Rs. 200/- in default to further undergo three months Sl.
	u/s 325/149 I.P.C.	to undergo five years Rl and fine of Rs. 200/- in default to further undergo three months Sl.
5. Sughra @ Sughar Singh	u/s 302/149 I.P.C.	to suffer imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 200/- in default to further undergo three months Rl.
	u/s 148 I.P.C.	to suffer three months Rl
	u/s 201 I.P.C.	to suffer three years Rl and fine of Rs. 200/- in default to further undergo three month

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1743

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, KHEM CHAND SHARMAMurari Lal – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA, KHEM CHAND SHARMA
Murari Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent