SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Raj) 1529

KHEM CHAND SHARMA
Subhash Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Accused/Appellant: S.L. Songara, Amicus Curiae.
For the Respondent: Sumitra Goyal, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - This appeal by accused Subhash Chand has been preferred against the judgment dated 1.9.98 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khetri District, Jhunjhnu by which he has convicted the accused appellant under Sections 363 and 366-A IPC and sentenced him to undergo four years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default thereof, to further undergo three months rigorous impressment on the first count and to undergo five years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default thereof, to further undergo six months rigorous imprisonment. Both the sentences were to run concurrently.

2. A girl named Sunita aged about 15 years was kidnapped by the accused appellant and her brother Shri Nathu Ram lodged a report Ex.R1 at Police Station, Khetri on 21.02.97, Stating therein that her sister Sunita aged about 15 years has been kidnapped by his neighbour Subhash S/o Shri Shiv Lal Chamar. Despite search she could not be traced. Upon this report Ex.R1 police registered a case vide FIR No. 29/97 and proceeded to investigate the case. During investigation police arrested the accused vide arrest memo Ex.R3 seized his under-wear vide memo Ex.R4 and recovered Kum















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top