SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Raj) 1152

O.P.BISHNOI
Trilok Dashottar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Pradeep Shah, Advocate.
For the Respondent: D.D. Kalla, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - This revision petition is filed by the husband against an order dated 27.3.2003 delivered by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udaipur.

2. The wife instituted a case before the said court for the offence under Section 498-A of the IPC with the allegation that she was thrown out of her in-laws house by her husband on 10.7.96 and since then, she has been living at her maternal house. It is alleged that she was tortured by the husband when she was living with him. The F.I.R. was lodged on 3.8.2000 and after appearance of the accused, he moved an application under Section 468 of the Cr.P.C. wherein it was contended that since the wife was not living with the husband and was living at her maternal house w.e.f. 10.7.96, no cognizance after, a period of 3 years i.e., 10.7.1999 could be taken against the husband. The learned trial court made an observation to the effect that an offence under Section 498-A of the IPC was a continuous offence and hence, Section 468 of the Cr.RC. was as good as irrelevant when the allegations are made for an offence under Section 498-A of the IPC. Feeling aggrieved, this revision petition has been filed.

3. I find that it is difficult to agre





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top