1. - By his judgment dated 10.1.1995, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pillibanga convicted the petitioner No. 1 Ram Kumar for the offences under Secs. 458, 324, 323 and 326 read with 34 I.PC. and petitioner No. 2 Sahib Ram for the offences under Section 458, 326, 323 and 324 read with 34 I.RC. in Cr. Case No. 487/92 and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment and fine. The petitioners preferred appeal which was decided on 20.3.1999 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Hanumangarh whereby the conviction of the petitioners was maintained for the offence under Secs. 458, 324 read with 34 I.RC. and the conviction and sentence for the offence under Section 326 and 326 read with 34 I.RC. was set-aside. Aggrieved by the aforesaid conviction, the petitioners have filed this revision petition.

2. Briefly stated the prosecution case is that Smt. Sampat daughter of the complainant Muriidhar was married to petitioner Ram Kumar. But their relations became strained and a case under Section 498-A I.RC. was pending against Ram Kumar. On 10.3.1992 Smt. Sampat was staying at the house of her parents. It is alleged that the petitioners entered In the house by opening the window