SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Raj) 1741

HARBANS LAL
Moti Lal & Khargosh @ Jagannath – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Shambhoo Singh, Advocate.
For the State: M.A. Bhurat, P.P.

JUDGMENT

1. - These two bail applications under Section 439 Cr.RC, have been filed on behalf of petitioners namely Moti Lal & Khargosh @ Jagannath against whom investigation is pending for the offences under Sections 376, 323/34 IPC and Section 3(iii) & (xii) SC/ST (RA.) Act in FIR No. 277/02 at Police Station Gowardhan Vilas, Udaipur.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that this false case has been foisted against the petitioners due to the case lodged by the accused persons against the complainant. The story as put forth is highly improbable and unbelievable in vie of the contradictions and discrepancies that have appeared in the statements of the witnesses. The medical report of Smt. Pushpa shows that no injury has been report of Smt. Pushpa shows that no injury has been found on her person and in the alleged manner of gang rape she must have received some injuries or the other on her person or private parts. The Doctor has not been able to give any definite opinion about rape. According to him, the story is totally cooked up in order to humiliate, harass and expose the petitioners to social redicule.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State has oppose





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top