SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Raj) 756

M.R.CALLA, V.K.SINGHAL
Bhanu – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Dhapa – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:H.P. Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:P.P. Gandhi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. This appeal under S. 19 of the Family Court Act, is directed against the order dated 19th March, 1992 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Ajmer, whereby a sum of Rs. 300/- per month has been allowed as maintenance to the respondent Smt. Dhapa w.e.f. 21st December, 1991 i.e. the date of the application under S. 125 Cr.P.C. The appellant filed the present appeal along with the stay-application and while the first stay-application is still pending; second stay-application was rejected on 20th August, 1993 on the ground that the first stay-application was pending and as such the second stay-application was not maintainable. The third stay-application had now been filed with the same prayer. The matter comes up before us for orders on the third stay-application and the matter has been argued. We find that the arguments on the stay- application and the main appeal are almost the same and therefore, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and with the consent of both the side, we deem it proper to decide the main appeal itself.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent Smt. Dhapa is the second wife of the appellant and she is already married to so








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top