SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Raj) 429

SOBHAG MAL JAIN
Amarchand – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - The accused absconded during the trial before the Munsif & Judicial Magistrate, Degana, for the offence under Sections 379 and 447 IPC. The accused was being tried for the theft of 'Khejri' tree. He has surrendered himself on Jan., 6, 1990. His bail application was rejected by the Sessions Judge as he was a absconder. I asked the Public Prosecutor to indicate as how much time the trial of the accused is likely to take. She is unable to throw any light on this question. The accused having absconded, deserves to be put on severe conditions to secure his attendance at the trial. Accordingly, it is directed that the accused shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10.000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees five thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the Munsif & Judicial Magistrate, Degana, and to abide by the following conditions:-

(i) that the accused shall remain present on each and every date of hearing during the trial of the case,

(ii) that the accused shall not go out of Rajasthan during the trial of the case,

(iii) that the accused shall report to the Station House Officer, P.S. Degana, once in




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top