1989 Supreme(Raj) 703
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
M.B.Sharma, J.
Kanha - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Cr. Misc. Pet. No. 581 of 1989.
Decided On : 29-06-1989
Imprisonment in default of fine under Section 68 IPC shall terminate if the fine is deposited.
Headnote:
Section 68 IPC - Imprisonment in default of fine - The court allowed the accused petitioner to deposit the fine and directed for his release if the fine was deposited.
Fact of the Case:
The accused petitioner was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment and a fine. The trial court ordered the accused to suffer further imprisonment in default of payment of the fine.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the trial court erred in sending the accused to judicial custody for not depositing the fine within the specified time, as the imprisonment in default of fine shall terminate if the fine is deposited.
Issues: The issue was whether the accused could be sent to judicial custody for not depositing the fine within the specified time.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 68 IPC, stating that the imprisonment imposed in default of fine shall terminate if the fine is deposited.
Final Decision: The court allowed the miscellaneous application and directed that the accused petitioner shall be released forthwith upon depositing the fine.
JUDGMENT
1. - The accused petitioner was convicted by learned Sessions Judge, Bundi under section 304/IPC and was sentenced to imprisonment as well as a fine of Rs. 1,000/-. The accused petitioner along with others preferred appeal in this court which was partly allowed and the sentence of imprisonment awarded by the trial court was reduced to imprisonment already undergone and the fine of Rs. 1,000/- was increased to Rs. 3,000/- and in default of payment of fine it was further ordered that the accused-petitioner shall suffer three years further imprisonment. This court granted three months time to deposit the fine. The aforesaid judgment of this court was pronounced on 6.1.1989 and the time of three months expired on 5.4.1989. The accused petitioner appeared before the trial court on 6.6.1989 and through his advocate requested that he will deposit the fine. The trial court in its order dated 26.6.1989 ordered that the time granted by this court could not be expended by that court. The application was dismissed and as given out by the learned counsel, the accused was sent to the judicial custody.
2. A bare reading of Section 68 I.P.C. will leave no manner of doubt that the imprisonment which was imposed in default of fine shall terminate if the fine as deposited. Therefore, deposite that fine would not be deposited within three months if the accused was willing to deposit the fine of Rs. 3.000/- the learned trial court could not have declined the same and the accused could not be sent to the judicial custody in lieu of payment of fine.
3. Consequently. I allow the misc. application and direct that if the accused petitioner deposits the fine he shall be released forth-with.Petition allowed.
*******
Click Here to Read the rest of this document