SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 1797

SANDEEP MEHTA
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Ajay @ Ajju – Respondent


Advocates:
For the State: Ashok Prajapat, P.P.
For the Respondent:Pankaj Gupta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The instant appeal has been preferred by the State of Raj asthan challenge the judgment dated 20.06.2008 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Sri Ganganagar in Cr.Case No.64/2006 whereby the respondent was acquitted of the charge under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act.

2. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that the SHO Kotwali, Sri Ganganagar and his associates were allegedly on patrolling duty on 25.07.2006 at about 5.35 P.M. It is stated that a person was seen standing in a suspicious condition near the gate of Gopi Ram Bagechi. He started running in a seeing the police vehicle. He was over powered and on asking the reason for trying to escape, the suspect could not give any satisfactory explanation.The police party suspected the action of the accused in trying to run away the locality the Act not complied - Accused acquitted. on seeing the police personnel, and therefore, if was thought fit to conduct his personal search. It is alleged that a by passer named Balram gave his counsel to be the witness in the search proceeding.The apprehended person disclosed his name to be Ajay @ Ajju. He was allegedly given an option of being searched in the presence











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top