SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Raj) 504

M.B.SHARMA
Umrao – Appellant
Versus
Lila Bai – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - The accused-petitioner Umrao was convicted under Section 494 IPC and the other accused petitioner Heeralal was convicted under Section 494 read with Section 109 IPC by the learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarh Bas and each of them was sentenced to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 50/-, or in default of payment of fine to further suffer one month's rigorous imprisonment. Each of them preferred an appeal before the learned Addl. Sessions Judge Kishangarh Bas and the learned Judge under his judgment dated June 14, 1985, dismissed the appeal both in respect of conviction and sentence. The present revision petition has been preferred against the aforesaid judgment.

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that one Smt. Lila Bai filed a complaint against the accused petitioners on June 12, 1974 in the court of Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Kishangarh Bas Distt. Alwar under Section 494 IPC read with Section 109 IPC wherein a case was set up that her marriage with the accused-petitioner No 1 took place in accordance with Hindu rites about 15 years age in village Kharila Teh. Kishangarh Bas Distt. Alwar, For a period of about 10 years aft









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top