SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Raj) 1179

RAJENDRA SAXENA
R. S. Khandelwal : Om Parkash Mathur – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - These petitions have been preferred against the order dated 22.2.95 passed by the learned Special Judge for Anti Corruption Department Case, Jaipur, by which he ordered to frame charge for the offences under sections 420, 120-B, 471 and 468 IPC and Under section 5(1 )(d) read with Section 5(2) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (in short 'the Act') and the charges framed on 14.3.95 in pursuance thereof against the accused petitioners.

2. Succinctly stated, the relevant facts are that in the basis of a news paper item publishing in `Hindustan Times' dated 31st July, 1984 regarding the irregularities in purchase of Portable Stone Crusher Shri G.C. Rai, Dy.S.P ACD, Bundi after conducting preliminary enquiry submitted report dated 23.3.87, whereupon FIR No. 33/1987 for offences Under sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 120-B IPC and under section 5(1 )(a) with Section 5(2) of the Act was registered at ACD Out Post, Bundi against petitioner R.S. Khandelwal. Executive Engineer Irrigation Department, Sub-Division, Tonk. However after completion of investigation, a challan was filed on 9.6.92 in the court of learned Special Judge, ACD cases, Jaipur. Briefly the allegation against the































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top