SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Raj) 381

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
K.S.Lodha, J.
Rameshwar S/o Sivji - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
S.B. Cr. Revision Petition No. 252 of 1984.
Decided On : 17-07-1984

Granting of probation based on the circumstances of the case, including the petitioner's age, lack of previous conviction, and the amount of liquor recovered

Headnote:

Rajasthan Prohibition Act - Conviction under Section 4(2) - Probation granted based on age, lack of previous conviction, and small amount of liquor recovered

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was convicted under Section 4(2) of the Rajasthan Prohibition Act and sentenced to six months' R.I. and a fine. The petitioner appealed the decision, seeking probation based on his age, lack of previous conviction, and the small amount of liquor recovered.

Finding of the Court:

The court, considering the circumstances pointed out by the petitioner's counsel, accepted the contention and set aside the sentence, granting probation instead. The petitioner was required to enter into a bond, maintain peace and good behavior, and pay a sum of Rs. 20 as cost of the proceedings to the State.

Issues: Conviction under the Rajasthan Prohibition Act, grant of probation based on circumstances of the case

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision to grant probation was influenced by the petitioner's age, lack of previous conviction, and the small amount of liquor recovered.

Final Decision: The revision was partly allowed, maintaining the conviction but setting aside the sentence and granting probation to the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

1. - The petitioner Rameshwar has been convicted u/s 4 (2) of the Rajasthan Prohibition Act and sentenced to six months' R.I. and a fine of Rs. 250/- by the learned Judl. Magistrate, Balotra on 5. 3. 81. This appeal was dismissed by the learned Sessions Judge, Balotra. Hence this revision.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned P. P. and have gone through the two judgments.

3. The learned counsel does not challenge the conviction of the petitioner but urges that looking to the age of the petitioner and the amount of the liquor recovered and the fact that the petitioner is not a previous convict, he may be granted benefit of probation. In view of this submission, the revision can be disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

4. Looking to all the circumstances of the case pointed out by the learned counsel, I am inclined to accept this contention. The accused is a young person. There is no previous conviction against him and the amount of the liquor recovered is also not much.

5. I, therefore, partly accept this revision and while maintaining the conviction of the petitioner, set aside the sentence awarded to him. He is not sentenced to any punishment forthwith but he shall be released on his entering into a bond in the sum of Rs. 3,000/- (Rs. three thousand) with a surety in like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Judl. Magistrate, Balotra to appear and receive sentence whenever called upon to do so within a period of two years and in the meantime, to maintain the peace and be of good behaviour. I further direct that he will pay a sum of Rs. 20)/- by way of cost of the proceedings to the State. This amount shall be deposited within one month from today.Revision partly allowed.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top