SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Raj) 320

DINKAR LAL MEHTA
Altaf : Banhsi – Appellant
Versus
State : State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Present appellants have submitted these appeals against the judgment dated 12-7-82 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 1 Bara. Both the appellants have been convicted under Sec. 394 and 324, I. P. C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years, and three years on each count, respectively. Fine of Rs. 200/- under Sec. 394 has been imposed in addition to the sentence of 5 years. Directions were also issued that the sentences shall run concurrently.

2. The Investigating Officer, Sorsan received the information that on July 7, 1981, some persons have committed robbery in the Jungle and, thereafter, some persons chased the accused and the accused party has given a beating to the persons who have chased them.

3. Shri Gulabsingh (P. W. 5) reached the village Sorsan on the basis of the said information received by him through intelligence and found there that the villagers have succeeded in capturing the accused and the accused are in their custody. Investigating Officer, Gulabsingh (P. W. 5) recorded the statement of Shri Kalyan, the victim of the incident, and forwarded that part of the statement to the police station. The first i

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top