SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Raj) 865

V.S.DAVE
Allahdeen – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the papers made available to me.

2. Father of the petitioner is to undergo a surgical operation for `Gall Bladder'. He had moved applications for grant of bail on this count earlier also but the same had been (illegible) as operations were postponed. Liberty was given to the petitioner in the previous bail-application to file fresh bail-application as and when the date of operation is fixed. He has now moved an application for bail with a certificate of from Dr. Brijendra Garg, Surgen in Govt. Hospital, Alwar, that the father of the petitioner who is aged 70 years is to undergo a surgical operation on 5th Sept., 1992.

3. In this view of the matter, keeping humanitarian consideration I deem it proper to grant interim bail to the accused petitioner namely Allahdeen son of Shri Mehtab, for a period of two weeks to attend his father during his period of recovery from operation. He shall be released on bail forthwith, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10.000/- (Rs. Ten thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Deeg, for his appearance in the sai



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top