SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 1309

VIJAY BISHNOI
Vijay – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Shambhoo Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Bohra, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners against the order dated 21.3.2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bali, district Pali (hereinafter referred to as 'the Revisional Court) in Criminal Revision No. 34/2012 filed on behalf of the petitioner whereby the revision petition was dismissed by the Revisional Court. The petitioners have also challenged the order dated 26.9.2012 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bali, District Pali (hereinafter referred to as the Trial Court') whereby cognizance was taken against the petitioner No. 1 for the offence punishable under Section 376 I.P.C. and against the petitioner No. 2 for the offence punishable under Section 376/120B I.P.C.

2. On the basis of complaint filed by the respondent No. 2 before the Trial Court, the police registered an F.I.R. No. 33/2011, dated 11.4.2011 at Police Station Faina against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 420 and 120-B I.P.C. After conclusion of the investigation, the police filed negative final report before the Trial Court while concluding that the allegations levelled in the F.I.R. by the respond










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top