SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 1617

ARUN BHANSALI
LR’s of Pannalal @ Panji – Appellant
Versus
Gheesalal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:K.C. Samdariya, Advocate.
For the Respondent:B.S. Mertiya, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against the judgment and decree dated 18.9.2007 passed by Additional District Judge (Fast Track), No. 1, Pali, Head Quarter Jaitaran, District Pali, whereby the appeal preferred by the appellants against the judgment and decree dated 5.10.2004 passed by Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Jaitaran, District Pali was dismissed and the decree passed by the trial court has been affirmed.

2. The facts, in brief, may be noticed thus: the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 Gheesa Lal filed a suit for permanent injunction on 11.10.1995 with the averments that a 'Bada' (Nohra) situated at Nimbaj was in the plaintiff's ancestral possession, around which slabs were put and was in the use of the plaintiff's family for over 40 years. It was claimed that the plaintiff's grand-father Budha Ram had a house in the said Nohra and during life time of his grand-father, defendant No. 1 Ganga Ram left Nimbaj; after death of his grand-father, the house being temporary, fell down and the plaintiff's father Rawat Ram started using the same as open land. The defendant No. 1 is permanent resident of Jaitaran for over 20 years and he never remained in possession.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top