SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 1078

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Mohammad Rafiq, J.
Sanjay Kumar Mishra and Another - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Others - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2472 of 2014.
Decided On : 4-03-2014

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: D.D. Khandelwal, Counsel.

The court's decision emphasized the importance of allowing the petitioners to address their grievance through representation to the Director General (Home Guard).

Headnote:

Quashment - Home Guard Selection Process - The court directed the petitioners to make a representation to the Director General (Home Guard) to address their grievance regarding the selection process.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners sought quashment of the entire selection process of Home Guard and rearrangement of physical test under video-graphy.

Finding of the Court:

The court directed the petitioners to make a representation to the Director General (Home Guard) to address their grievance within four weeks.

Issues: Petitioners' exclusion from the select list despite qualifying the physical test.

Ratio Decidendi: The court disposed of the writ petition by requiring the petitioners to make a representation to the Director General (Home Guard) to address their grievance.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with the direction for the petitioners to make a representation to the Director General (Home Guard) to address their grievance.

JUDGMENT

1. - Petitioners have filed this writ petition praying for quashment of entire selection process of Home Guard of Kaman, District Bharatpur. They also prayed for a direction to respondents to rearrange physical test of petitioners under monitoring video-graphy to show actual result of race test and consider their candidature for appointment on the post of Home Guard, if they are found eligible otherwise.

2. Pursuant to advertisement, petitioners applied for the post of Home Guard. Petitioners appeared in the test vide their token no.119 and 60, respectively. They also appeared in the physical test. They were confident of their selection but they did not find their names in the select list. Grievance of petitioners is that despite qualifying the physical test, their names have not been included in the select list.

3. In the facts of the case, writ petition is disposed of requiring the petitioners to make representation to respondent no.3 - Director General (Home Guard), Jaipur, along-with a copy of this order, who shall consider the same and pass a speaking order addressing their grievance within four weeks from the date of its making.Writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. This also disposes of stay application.Writ Petition Disposed of as Above.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top