SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 1537

VIJAY BISHNOI
Jalil Mohammed – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Foroz Khan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Vikram Rajpurohit, Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

1. - This Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C ha been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 9.4.2014 passed by the Sessions Judge, Jodhpur Metropolitan (for short 'the Revisional Court hereinafter), whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner has been dismissed as not maintainable. The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 12.3.2014 passed by the Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No. 9, Jodhpur Metropolitan in Criminal Case No. 7413/2009, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 91 Cr.P.C. in the proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act pending against him, has been rejected.

2. The Trial Court, while rejecting the application under Section 91 Cr.P.C has observed as under:

"mHk; i{kdkjku ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g tkfgj gS fd fnukad 12-12-2011 dks eqyfte e; vf/koDrk mifLFkr Fkk rFkk mlus jkthukek gsrq le; pkgrs gq;s ikap gtkj :i;s ifjoknh dks vkaf'kd Hkqxrku isVs iznku fd;sA blds i'pkr~ Hkh vfHk;qDr }kjk yxkrkj jkthukek gsrq volj fy;s tkrs jgsaA fnukad 13-9-2012 dks eqyfte us 'ks"k pSd jkf'k gsrq 15&20 fnu dk iqu% volj pkgkA fnukad 17-1-






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top