2013 Supreme(Raj) 2143
SANDEEP MEHTA
Raxpal Sihag – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Nishant Motsara, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Rajiaxmi Choudhary, Public Prosecutor
JUDGMENT
1. - The instant misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 16.2.2013 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Churu in revision whereby the learned Sessions Judge affirmed the order dated 16.5.2005 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu accepting the Final Report filed by the Police Officers of the Police Station Kotwali, Churu after investigation of F.I.R. No. 73/2004 .
2. The instant misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner complainant against the a foresaid orders passed by the subordinate Courts seeking a direction for reinvestigation/further investigation of the case of the grounds proposed by the petitioner and on the basis of the documents available with him.
3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioner submitted a complaint in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Churu on 15.4.2004. As per the allegations levelled in the complaint, the respondents Naurang Lal and Parmeshwari Devi both being public servants used to reside at Government allotted quarters at the Churu Town. They fraudulently managed the induction of their names in the votes list prepared for the villages. It was also all
Click Here to Read the rest of this document