SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1914

R.S.CHAUHAN
Yogita – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:P.K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:K.L. Thakur, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The appellant, Smt. Yogita, is aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 21.04.2008 passed by District Judge Sirohi, whereby the learned Judge has allowed the petition filed by the respondent, Ramesh Singh, under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, and has granted a decree of divorce in his favour.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant-wife was married to the respondent-husband on 22.02.1999 at Sirohi according to the Hindu rites and customs. Out of the wedlock, a son, Mitesh, was born. The respondent husband filed a petition under Section 13, Hindu Marriage Act for divorce on the ground of cruelty on the part of appellant-wife. According to the respondent, the spouses were having good terms for the first two years of the marriage. But thereafter, the appellant wife kept on pressurising the respondent to leave his parents and to shift to Sirohi. She even left the house of respondent-husband without informing him. She started living at Sirohi without any rhyme or reason. After some persuasion, she was brought back only for few days. But again she went back to Sirohi. She kept on pressurising the respondent husband to get himself transferred to Sirohi.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top