SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1857

R.S.CHAUHAN
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Muktesh Maheshwari, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The petitioner, Jagdish, is aggrieved by the order dated 7.6.2012, passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.) Gharsana, District Sriganganagar, whereby the learned Magistrate has allowed an application filed by the respondent No.4, Bajrang Lal, under Order 1 Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 C.P.C. for arraying him as a party in the suit.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had filed a suit against the Gram Panchayat for mandatory, and permanent injunction. In his plaint, he has claimed that he is in possession of property situated at 8 PSC 'B' Khajuwala Road, Near Jambheshwar Temple. The said property is ad-measuring 70X170 ft. The said plot is registered as Gair Mumkin Aabadi. He had further claimed that he is in possession of said plot for last thirty years. Since he was in possession of the land for a long time, in 1976 he had applied to the Gram Panchayat for the allotment of the said land in his name. Therefore, on 20.3.1978, the Sarpanch had issued a NOC in his favour. Subsequently, the petitioner applied for being granted the lease deed for the said plot. However, the respondents have not acted upon his request. When the petitioner started raising certa









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top