1. - Although this case has a convoluted history, but as the case has come up on the third stay application, all the facts of the case need not be narrated at this stage. Moreover, all the issues being raised need not be addressed, for any observation made by this Court may adversely affect the final out come of the writ petition.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the petitioner, Rohit Singh was appointed as a Project Engineer (Senior) in July, 1995 with the Rajasthan Housing Board ('the RHB', for short). On 10.05.2002, the petitioner was sent on deputation from RHB to the Jaipur Development Authority ('the JDA', for short). In pursuance of the said order, on 17.05.2002, the petitioner was relieved from the RHB and joined the JDA. Vide order dated 08.06.2004 and in consequence of its decision taken on 17.11.2001, the JDA decided to create thirteen posts of Sector Engineer which were to be filled in only by deputation. Meanwhile, after expiry of three years of deputation, the petitioner's term of deputation was extended for a period of one year w.e.f. 17.05.2005. On 02.05.2005, the Government of Rajasthan asked for no objection from the JDA for permanently absorbin