SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 1115

VINEET KOTHARI
Pramila Kumari Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Shri Narayan Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Vishal Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mahendra Pareek, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - By this transfer application, the petitioner-wife has sought transfer of case No.203/2009 - Narayan Sharma v. Pramila Kumari Sharma filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act pending before the Family Court, Ajmer seeking transfer of the case to the learned District and Sessions Judge, Merta on the ground of convenience as she is living with her parents at Merta.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner-wife Mr. Vishal Sharma submitted that the lady being alone having child of 31/2 years son Keshav has extreme difficulty to attend the hearing at Ajmer Court by undertaking a journey of 2 hours on each occasion. He also submits that she is unemployed and now will have to seek employment to earn her livelihood.

3. On the other hand, Mr. Mahendra Pareek, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-husband opposed the transfer application on the ground that the respondent-husband is also living at Vijay Nagar, District Ajmer and has to travel at Ajmer Court for attending hearing. Therefore, inconvenience to both the parties is of the same amount and mere convenience of the petitioner-wife is not ground to transfer the proceedings from the Court having competent jurisdi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top