SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 984

BELA M.TRIVEDI
Kanhaiya Lal – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Sushila Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Saransh Saini, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Damodar Mishra, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners-plaintiffs, challenging the order dated 30.11.2013 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Camp Court Dudu, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as "the trial court"), whereby the trial court has not marked the documents as exhibit, produced by the petitioners along-with the affidavit.

2. After having heard the learned counsels for the parties, it appears that the only controversy raised by the petitioners-plaintiffs is that the trial court though has observed that the documents produced by the petitioners-plaintiffs are public documents, and deserve to be exhibited, did not exhibit the same, by holding that the said documents could not be exhibited by the affidavit filed by the petitioners. It is not disputed by the learned counsels for the parties that the documents in question are the public documents, they being certified copies of the orders, and that the said documents were permitted to be produced by the court. It is also not disputed that the suit is now fixed for final arguments, and therefore no other stage is left for exhibiting the said documents.

3. Under the circumstances, when the petition




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top