SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Raj) 2154

N.P.GUPTA, GOVIND MATHUR
Leela Kunwar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant/Petitioner:Sajjan Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Moti Singh and K.K. Bissa, AGC.

JUDGMENT

1. - These two appeals have been filed against two different orders of the learned Single Judge in two different writ petitions on two different dates, but then the two matters are closely interlinked, and therefore, they are being decided by this common order.

2. Appeal No.246 arises out of the order passed by learned Single Judge on 16.12.2008 in the writ petition of Babu Singh being S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7320/08, noticing that according to learned counsel for the petitioner (Babu Singh) after passing of the order of the learned Collector, certain proceedings were initiated, but it is not finalised till today. In that view of the matter, the Gram Panchayat was directed to decide the matter as per direction issued by learned Collector, within a period of two months from that date, and also directed that possession of the writ petition (Babu Singh) shall not be disturbed. In the appeal it is alleged that, that statement was wrongly made, inasmuch as, the matter had already been decided by the Gram Panchayat in the meeting dated 21.7.2006.

3. We find from the writ petition that the Collector had passed the order on 18.4.2006 while according to the synopsis attached to th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top