SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 976

AMITAVA ROY, VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Sarwar Siddiqui – Appellant
Versus
Syed Anwar Ali – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Anil Mehta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard Mr. Anil Mehta, the learned counsel for the appellant.

2. For the order proposed to be passed, it is not considered essential to issue formal issue.

3. The respondent No.1 herein, instituted S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14611/2009, seeking appropriate writ, amongst others, to interfere with the order dated 02.09.2008, passed by the learned Civil Judge & Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ajmer, appointing the appellant herein, as the acting Chairman of the Dargah Hajrat Meera Sahab, Taragarh, Ajmer (for short, hereafter referred to as 'the Dargah') and to appoint a regular Chairman in his place. An appropriate direction was also sought for to order the learned Civil Judge, Ajmer (respondent No.2 in the writ petition) to hold a proper enquiry against the appellant. The respondent No.1 pleaded that as far back in the year 1894, a suit i.e. Civil Suit No.213/1894 Nazaf Ali & Ors. Khadims of the Dargah Meera Sahab v. Gulzar Ali , was instituted alleging chiefly that the Dargah was not being properly managed and further due to financial irregularities, it was being exposed to considerable loss. By the judgment and order dated 27.10.1896, the learned Sub Judge, First Class, Ajm





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top