2014 Supreme(Raj) 1643
AJAY RASTOGI, J.K.RANKA
Prashant Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Prashant Yadav, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ravindra Maheshwari, Registrar (Classification) Raj. High Court Bench.
JUDGMENT
1. - By way of instant writ petition, the petitioner has impugned order of the Govt. of Rajasthan dated 31.3.2010 whereby in pursuance of Rule 53(1) of Raj. Civil Service Pension Rules, 1996 (Rules 1996) he was compulsorily retired on recommendation of the High Court.
2. The facts that culled out are that the petitioner was initially selected in Rajasthan Judicial Service in the year 1989 and appointed as Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate. He was promoted to the post of Civil Judge-Cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in the year 1997 and promoted on the post of Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track) in the year 2003 and thereafter in the cadre of RHJS as Additional District & Session Judge vide order dated 11.1.2008.
3. While the petitioner was working as an officer of Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service, a committee of five Hon'ble Judges of this Court was constituted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice vide order dated 30.11.2009 to consider the cases of such of the judicial officers of the State of Rajasthan who have become deadwood or lost its utility for compulsory retirement obviously who qualified pre conditions contemplated under R. 53(1) of Rules 1996, however,
Click Here to Read the rest of this document