SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 2128

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Somoti – Appellant
Versus
Board of Revenue – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Bharat Saini, Advocate.
For the Respondents:H.S. Bikarwar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This writ petition is directed against the judgment of the Board of Revenue dated 9/4/2013 which has over turned the judgment of the Divisional Commissioner dated 5/4/2012 and that of the Additional Collector dated 14/9/2007. The Additional Collector in his judgment while condoning the delay of 11 years in appeal filed by the petitioner and remanded the matter to the Tehsildar for deciding the question of mutation again.

2. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that brother of the petitioners, declaring himself as sole legal representative of their father, got the entire land mutated in their favour and therefore mutation proceedings have rightly been revoked on remand by the Additional Collector. It is argued that the delay of 11 years in filing the appeal occurred because petitioners were completely unaware of the mutation entry dated 24/1/1994 having been attested in favour of respondent No.5 and even if the appeal was filed on 14/12/2005, delay has rightly been condoned.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents opposed the writ petition and submitted that land was purchased by respondents No.6 and 7 in 2000 and they are in possession since then. In f






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top