SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 2163

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Gopal Krishan Vyas, J.
Anita Jain - Appellant
Versus
State of Raj. & Anr. - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8095 of 2012.
Decided On : 26-11-2013

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:B.L. Tiwari, Advocate.
For the Respondents: P. Dave, Dy. Govt. Counsel.

The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, is empowered to cancel a permit under Section 86(4) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as per the communication dated 13.2.2013 issued by the Member, Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur.

Headnote:

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT - CANCELLATION OF PERMIT - SECTION 86(4) - DELEGATION OF POWER - SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY - JURISDICTION - POWER TO CANCEL PERMIT - COMMUNICATION DATED 13.2.2013 - INTERPRETATION - SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY EMPOWERED TO CANCEL PERMIT - ORDER OF CANCELLATION QUASHED - LIBERTY TO SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY TO TAKE ACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH COMMUNICATION DATED 13.2.2013.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the order of cancellation of permit issued in his favor by the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, on the ground that the Secretary lacked jurisdiction to decide the question of cancellation of permit.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, was empowered to cancel the permit under Section 86(4) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as per the communication dated 13.2.2013 issued by the Member, Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur.

Issues: Whether the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, had the jurisdiction to cancel the permit issued in favor of the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, was empowered to cancel the permit under Section 86(4) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as per the communication dated 13.2.2013 issued by the Member, Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur. Therefore, the order of cancellation impugned in the writ petition was not sustainable in law.

Final Decision: The court quashed the order of cancellation of permit passed by the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, and granted liberty to the Secretary to take action in accordance with the communication dated 13.2.2013 issued by the Member, Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order impugned on the ground that the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority has no jurisdiction to decide the question of cancellation of permit issued in favour of the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited attention of this Court towards the fact that an order was issued on 17.4.2008 by the Member, Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur, Jodhpur, Udaipur, Bikaner, Ajmer, Alwar, Kota, Sikar, Pali, Chittorgarh, Dausa whereby certain powers were delegated to the Secretaries of Regional Transport Authority of the respective regions, in that resolution, no power has been delegated to exercise power under Section 86 (4) of the Motor Vehicles Act for cancellation of permit, therefore, order impugned may be quashed.

4. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner on 06.8.2012, an interim order was passed in this petition whereby the order dated 18.7.2012 passed by the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority was stayed by the Court.

5. While filing reply, the respondents have placed on record Annexure-R/1 to apprise this Court that on 10.7.2008, the power of cancellation has also been delegated to the Secretaries of the respective regions under Section 86 (4) of the Act, therefore, no interference is called for.

6. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the parties invited attention of this Court towards the communication dated 13.2.2013 whereby certain directions were issued to the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority of all the regions. The said communication dated 13.2.2013 reads as under:-

dzekad% ,Q9(253)@ifj@vkj0Vh0,0@,l0Vh0,0@1988&99 ikVZ 18323

t;iqj] %13@02@13

lfpo@vfr] lfpo]

izknsf'kd ifjogu izkf/kdkj]

leLrA

fo"k; %& eksVj ;ku fu;e 1988 dh /kkjk 86 ds rgr dk;Zokgh ckcr~A

eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e 1988 dh /kkjk 68 dh mi/kkjk (5) lglifBr] jktLFkku eksVj ;ku fu;e 1990 ds fu;e 54 ds vUrxZr tu lqfo/kk dh n`f"V ls izknsf'kd ifjogu izkf/kdkj ,oa jkT; ifjogu izkf/kdkj }kjk viuh 'kfDr;ksa dk izR;k;kstu lfpoksa@vfr0 lfpoksa] izknsf'kd ifjogu izkf/kdkj dks fd;k x;k FkkA

'kfDr;ksa ds izR;k;kstu gsrq tkjh fofHkUu ladYiksa Resolution lfpoksa@vfr0 lfpoksa dks fofHkUu izdkj ds vuqKk i=ksa ds vkosnuks ij fopk dj izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k fu;ekuqlkj djus gsrq vf/kd`r djrs gq, vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 86 ds rgr uksfVl tkjh djus ,oa izdj.k fuLrkj.k djus gsrq Hkh lfpoksa@vfr0 lfpoksa dks vf/kd`r fd;k x;k FkkA

mijksDr izR;k;ksftr 'kfDr;ksa dk mi;ksx djrs le; eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e 1988 dh /kkjk 86 ds vUrxZr izdj.kksa dk fuLrkj.k djrs gq, /kkjk 86 dh mi/kkjk (4) ds izko/kkuksa dh vuns[kh dj vuqKk i=ksa ds fujLrhdj.k vkns'k Hkh tkjh fd, tk jgs gSa] tcfd mi/kkjk (4) esa Li"V gS fd izR;k;ksftr 'kfDr;ksa ds rgr vuqKk i= fujLrhdj.k ds vfrfjDr izdj.kksa dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tk ldsxkA

vr% bl laca/k esa leLr lacaf/kr vf/kdkfj;ksa dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd eksVj ;ku vf/kfu;e 1988 dh /kkjk 86 ds vUrxZr izdj.kksa dk fuLrkj.k djus gsrq ;fn izdj.k vuqKk i= fujLrhdj.k ;ksX; le>k tkosa rks /kkjk 86(4) ds izko/kkuksa ds vuq:i lfpo@vfr0 lfpo }kjk vuqKk i= fujLr u fd;k tkosa bl viuh Li"V vuq'ka"kk lfgr izdj.k dks lnL; izknsf'kd ifjogu izkf/kdkj@jkT; ijfogu izkf/kdkj ds le{k vko';d dk;Zokgh gsrq izLrqr fd;k tkosaA"

7. In view of above, the order of cancellation impugned in this writ petition is not sustainable in law. Therefore, the cancellation order dated 18.7.2012 passed by the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority is hereby quashed and set aside with the liberty to the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority to take action in accordance with the aforesaid communication dated 13.2.2013 issued by the Member, Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur. It is made clear that before taking any action against the petitioner for cancellation of permit, the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur shall grant opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, then pass the order.

8. The writ petition is allowed in above terms.Petition Allowed.

*******


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top