2014 Supreme(Raj) 774
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AT JAIPUR BENCH
Alok Sharma, J.
Dr. Udesh Sharma - Appellant
Versus
Addl. Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) West Jaipur City, Jaipur and others - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11584 of 2009 and 11548 of 2009.
Decided On : 13-01-2014
Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Vimal Chaudhary, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 2:Sanjay Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4:Shailesh P. Sharma, Advocate.
A consumer has a fundamental right to an electricity connection under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Headnote:
ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 - SECTION 43, 126, 145 - ELECTRICITY RULES, 1956 - RULE 53 - RIGHT TO ELECTRICITY CONNECTION - SEPARATE CONNECTION - COURT DIRECTED JVVNL TO PROVIDE SEPARATE ELECTRICITY CONNECTION TO THE DEFENDANT WITHIN THREE MONTHS.
Fact of the Case:
Plaintiff and defendant Durga Sharma had a joint electricity connection for their respective portions of the house No. B-23 Sen Colony, Power House Road, Bani Park Jaipur. Due to disputes, the plaintiff disconnected the electricity supply to the defendant's portion. The defendant filed an application before the trial court seeking directions to the plaintiff and Jaipur Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (JVVNL) to recommence the electricity supply. The trial court directed the plaintiff to recommence the electricity supply.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the defendant has a fundamental right to an electricity connection under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The court also held that the plaintiff is bound to pay the bills drawn by JVVNL on the basis of consumption recorded by the joint meter, which is causing problems.
Issues: 1. Whether the defendant has a fundamental right to an electricity connection? 2. Whether the plaintiff is bound to pay the bills drawn by JVVNL on the basis of consumption recorded by the joint meter?
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, the Electricity Rules, 1956, and the Constitution of India to arrive at its decision. The court held that the defendant has a fundamental right to an electricity connection under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The court also held that the plaintiff is bound to pay the bills drawn by JVVNL on the basis of consumption recorded by the joint meter.
Final Decision: The court directed the JVVNL to provide a separate electricity connection to the defendant within three months. The court also directed the defendant to continue paying 50% of the bill for consumption of electricity from the joint meter till the separate connection is installed.
JUDGMENT
1. - This petition has been filed by the petitioner-plaintiff (hereinafter 'the plaintiff) against the order dated 16.04.2009 whereby the learned trial Court has directed that the supply of electricity to the house of defendant-respondent No. 2 Durga Sharma (hereinafter 'the defendant Durga Sharma') be recommenced and no obstruction in respect thereto be caused by the plaintiff. The facts of the case are that in respect of a house No. B-23 Sen Colony, Power House Road, Bani Park Jaipur, the erstwhile owner of the house Ram Kishore Sharma is stated to have given certain portions in the aforesaid house both to the plaintiff and to the defendant Durga Sharma. It however transpires that in respect of electricity supply to their respective portions of the plaintiff and the defendant Durga Sharma there was a joint electricity connection. Owing to certain disputes and disagreement between the plaintiff and the defendant Durga Sharma, supply of electricity to the portion of defendant Durga Sharma was disconnected. This entailed an application by the defendant Durga Sharma before the trial Court in a suit laid by the plaintiff against her seeking directions to the plaintiff as also to the Jaipur Vidhyut Vitaran Nigam Limited (hereinafter 'the JVVNL') to recommence the supply of electricity to the portion occupied by her from the joint meter installed at the house No. B-23 Sen Colony, Power House Road, Bani Park Jaipur. The trial Court by the impugned order dated 16.04.2009 made a direction as sought by the defendant.
2. Hence this petition.
3. Learned counsel for the plaintiff Mr. Vimal Chaudhary has stated that a joint connection in the name of plaintiff entails problems as the plaintiff is bound to pay the bills drawn by JVVNL on the basis of consumption recorded by the said meter. He submits that albeit the defendant Durga Sharma has a fundamental right to a electricity connection, yet the learned trial Court by the impugned order ought to have directed that defendant Durga Sharma obtain separate electricity connection from the JVVNL for the portion occupied by her in house No. B-23 Sen Colony, Power House Road, Bani Park Jaipur.
4. Mr. Sanjay Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of defendant Durga Sharma submits that in view of the pre-existing meter electricity can be supplied to both the portions of house No. B-23 Sen Colony, Power House Road, Bani Park Jaipur belonging to plaintiff and the defendant Durga Sharma therefrom as has been rightly directed by the trial Court. He further submitted that the defendant Durga Sharma has a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India to a electricity connection and she was thus entitled to continuation of electricity supply to her portion in the house No. B-23 Sen Colony, Power House Road, Bani Park Jaipur from the pre existing joint meter. He submits that aside of a joint meter, a sub meter has also been got installed privately by the defendant Durga Sharma to record the electricity consumed by her for which she had attempted to pay/reimburse the plaintiff but without success as the plaintiff was only intent upon denying her access to electricity rendering the very use of her portion of the house impossible. He further submits that in terms of the order dated 30.01.2013, passed by this Court the defendant Durga Sharma is paying 50% of the electricity bills. He further submits that however to eschew all potential objections and disputes between the plaintiff and the defendant Durga Sharma, the JVVNL be directed to provide a separate connection for recording electricity consumption by the defendant Durga Sharma.
5. Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma, learned counsel for the JVVNL states that in the event an application is made for a separate electricity connection to the portion of the defendant's over plot No. B-23 Sen Colony, Power House Road, Bani Park Jaipur, JVVNL would make a feasibility inspection and provide a separate electricity connection most plausible wit
Click Here to Read the rest of this document