SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 2056

BELA M.TRIVEDI
Radheyshyam – Appellant
Versus
Patasi Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:V.K. Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Madhvi Goswami, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 25.6.08 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dudu, Jaipur, (hereinafter referred to as 'the trial court') whereby the trial court has dismissed the application of the petitioner-accused filed under Section 1 of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'), in Application No. 124/06 filed by the respondent under Section 12 of the said Act.

2. The only contention raised by the learned counsel Mr. V.K. Sharma for the petitioner is that the alleged incident of domestic violence is pertaining to the period 2003 and 2004, whereas the said Act of 2005 had come into force in October, 2006 and, therefore, the respondent could not have filed the case under the said Act against the present petitioner.

3. In the opinion of the court the issue involved is squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court in case of V.D. Bhanot v. Savita Bhanot, 2012 (3) SCC, 183 , in which the Apex Court while upholding the decision of the Delhi High Court held interalia that even if a wife who had shared a household in past bu





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top