SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 1863

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Sandeep Mehta, J.
Manoj Kumaria Shankaria - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and another - Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 2084 of 2013.
Decided On : 29-10-2014

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. M.K.Garg, Advocate.
For the State: Mr. O.P.Rathi, P.P.
For the Respondent No. 2:Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate.

Allegations constituting bailable offences and the accused's direction to appear before the Magistrate for filing of the charge-sheet and to be released on furnishing bail and bonds.

Headnote:

Quashing - FIR - The court held that the allegations against the petitioner constituted bailable offences, and directed the accused to appear before the Magistrate for filing of the charge-sheet and to be released on furnishing bail and bonds.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought quashing of the FIR registered for offences under Sections 354 and 323 IPC, relating to disputes arising from his affairs with the complainant's daughter.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the allegations constituted bailable offences and directed the accused to appear before the Magistrate for filing of the charge-sheet and to be released on furnishing bail and bonds.

Issues: Allegations of offences under Sections 354 and 323 IPC, and 11/12 of POCSO Act against the petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the allegations against the petitioner constituted bailable offences, and directed the accused to appear before the Magistrate for filing of the charge-sheet and to be released on furnishing bail and bonds.

Final Decision: The misc. petition was disposed of, and the accused was directed to appear before the Magistrate for filing of the charge-sheet and to be released on furnishing bail and bonds.

JUDGMENT

1. - The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking quashing of the FIR No.235/2013 registered at the Police Station Mahila Thana, Srigangangar for the offences under Sections 354 and 323 IPC.

2. I have heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the impugned FIR as well as the case diary.

3. As per the facts available on record it is evident that the petitioner was having affairs with the complainants daughter Sushri Suman. He married her on 25.8.2013. It appears that the some disputes arose between the parties owing to the said affairs and the petitioner filed an FIR No.421/2013 against the complainant party on 7.8.2013. In the meantime, the impugned FIR No.235/2013 came to be filed against the petitioner at the Woman Police Station Sriganganagar for the offences under Sections 354 and 323 I PC. The allegation as set out in the FIR is that the petitioner caught hold of-hand of Sushri Renu, the sister of Suman with whom, the petitioner subsequently married.

4. The Investigating Officer after investigation has concluded that the offences under Sections 354, 323 IPC and 11/12 of POCSO Act are made out against the petitioner. The offence under Section 11/12 of the POCSO Act is bailable. So far as the offence under Section 354 IPC is concerned, the highest allegation against the petitioner is that he caught hold of the hand of the girl. Whether or not such act would be covered within the mischief of the phrase "outraging modesty" of the girl would be for the trial Court to examine at the appropriate stage. Prima-facie, even if the prosecution allegations are accepted as true on the face value, then act of the accused would be covered under Section 354A of the IPC, which is bailable. Thus, all the allegations against the petitioner constitute bailable offences.

5. The accused is given liberty to submit a representation to the i Investigating Officer, who shall consider the same in light of the totality of facts before reaching at any conclusion. If he concludes that charge-sheet should be filed in the matter, he shall intimate the accused about the date of filing of charge-sheet. In order to ensure presence of the accused during trial, he is directed to appear before the Magistrate on the date so intimated to him by the Investigating Officer for filing of the charge-sheet. Upon his appearance before the trial Court, he shall be released on furnishing bail and bonds to the trial courts satisfaction.

6. The misc. petition is disposed of as such.Petition disposed of.

*******



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top