SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Raj) 1011

NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN II
Hans Raj – Appellant
Versus
Dwarika. – Respondent


For the Petitioner:B.R. Vashishtha on behalf of Prahlad Sharma, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. This revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. has been filed against the judgment and order dated 18.07.2011 passed by Sessions Judge, Tonk (hereinafter referred to as 'the Appellate Court') in Criminal Appeal No. 28/2010, whereby the Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner-husband and upheld the order dated 27.05.2010 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Newai (Tonk) (hereinafter referred to as the Trial Court), granting interim maintenance of Rs. 500/- per month each to Respondent No. 1 to 3 and Rs. 750/- towards rent per month, total Rs. 2,250/-.

3. The concise facts of the case are that Respondents No. 1 to 3 filed a complaint under Section 12 of The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005(hereinafter referred to as the Act of 2005) against the petitioner and five others, Respondents No. 4 to 8 herein. It was averred in the complaint that the complainants are wife and sons of the petitioner, but they have been dispossessed from their legal properties, the petitioner has also committed domestic violence with the complainants, therefore, protection as







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top