RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Govind Mathur, Banwari Lal Sharma, JJ.
Neeraj Kachhawaha - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. - Respondent
D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 159 of 2013.
Decided On : 10-05-2013
NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE - IRC GUIDELINES - IRC-2009 - 4.6.3, 4.6.4 - SUMMARY
Fact of the Case:
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. proposed to establish a retail outlet dealership at Mandalnath Bypass Road, Jodhpur. The petitioner, who operates a nearby petrol pump, objected, claiming that it would violate fuel station establishment norms. The High Court had earlier directed the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. to adhere to IRC-2009 guidelines while establishing the outlet.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court found that the Police Commissionerate, Jodhpur, had conducted a thorough inquiry before issuing the "No Objection Certificate" and imposed conditions to ensure adherence to IRC-2009 guidelines. The court held that if any violation of these conditions occurred, the certificate could be canceled.
Issues: 1. Whether the petitioner had the right to challenge the "No Objection Certificate" issued by the Commissioner of Police, Jodhpur. 2. Whether the "No Objection Certificate" was issued in violation of IRC-2009 guidelines.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish his right to challenge the "No Objection Certificate" as he had not demonstrated any specific injury or violation of his legal rights. 2. The court found that the Police Commissionerate had taken all necessary steps to ensure compliance with IRC-2009 guidelines and had imposed conditions to prevent any violation. The court held that the "No Objection Certificate" was issued in accordance with the law.
Final Decision: The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the judgment of the Single Bench and refusing to interfere with the "No Objection Certificate" issued by the Police Commissionerate, Jodhpur.
"4.6.3 - If two or more fuel stations are to be sited in close proximity for some reasons, these would be grouped together to have a common access through a service road of 7.0 m width and connected to the highway through acceleration, deceleration lanes. From these considerations, the permission for the new fuel stations would be considered only if it is either in proximity to the existing one so that the common access can be provided or the new one located at distance of more than 1000 m. Any objection from the existing fuel station owner against granting of access permission from the highway for the proposed new fuel station are to be overruled and access to all fuel stations in case of clustering, shall invariably be from the service road only.
4.6.4 - For installation of new fuel station within the 1000 m or 300 m distance of existing fuel station as the case may be, new entrant would be responsible for construction and maintenance of the common service road, deceleration and acceleration lanes, drainage and traffic control devices. Wherever, available ROW is inadequate to accommodate such service roads, deceleration/acceleration lanes, etc. the additional land by the side of ROW to accommodate such service roads shall also be acquired by the new entrant Oil Company. In case of billy/mountainous terrain, common service roads at all such locations may not be possible as per the site conditions and, therefore, common access through service roads would not be a precondition."
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.