SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Raj) 1129

M.N.BHANDARI
Ram Babu Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Kailash Chandra Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - By this writ petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 07.12.2011 whereby the Labour Court dismissed the application moved by the petitioner for correction of his father's name.

2. It is stated that after passing the award by the Labour Court, a writ petition as filed. The said writ petition was dismissed, however, in the appeal, a liberty was given to the petitioner to seek amendment in father's name by moving an application before the Labour Court. The petitioner accordingly moved an application for correction in his father's name, however, the same has been declined. It is stated that petitioner's father's name was wrongly mentioned, thus necessary correction in that regard was asked but ignoring the direction of Hon'ble Division Bench, the same has been denied. Accordingly, a prayer is made to set aside the impugned order of the Labour Court.

3. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel and perused the record.

4. The application filed by petitioner was dealt with by the Labour Court after discussing every aspect of the matter. It was found that throughout petitioner's father's name was mentioned as Om Prakash. The petitioner never raised










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top