1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 17.12.2012 (Annex.P/1) passed by learned Additional District Judge, No.1, Udaipur while trying the election petition filed by the respondent in respect of of Municipal Council election of the petitioner, has reopened the trial and issued summons for examination of four witnesses, after the judgment/order was reserved. The first para of the order itself indicates it. The order permits the plaintiff-respondent to further adduce evidence for summoning the witnesses in support of his case. Being aggrieved by that, the defendant-petitioner, who is the elected candidate, has approached this Court by way of present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

3. Mr. Sandeep Saruparia, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that after the evidence was over of the plaintiff-respondent on 04.08.2011 and all the relevant documents were produced by the respondent, the defendant also adduced evidence and thereafter, after hearing the arguments, the order on the election petition was reserved, however, at the fag end of the trial, at this stage, at the req