SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 2044

R.S.CHAUHAN
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Vipin Makad, Advocate.
For the State: Anil Upadhyay PP.

JUDGMENT

1. - Being aggrieved with the order dated 21.07.2010 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases, Hanumangarh, whereby the learned Judge has rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 457 Cr.P.C., for releasing of Motor Cycle, bearing registration No. RJ-31-SC-1130 and mobile phone, the petitioner has approached this Court.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is the owner of the Motor Cycle, bearing registration No. RJ-31-SC1130, which was seized on 12.04.2010 due to transportation of ten gms. of Smack. Therefore, the petitioner submitted an application under Section 457 Cr.P.C. before the learned Judge for release of the said vehicle as well as mobile phone on "supurdgi". However, vide order dated 21.07.2010, the said application was dismissed. Hence, this petition before this Court.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the cases of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat, [JT 2002 (10) SC 80) , Bharat Mehta v. State by Inspector of Police, Chennai, [AIR 2008 SC 1970] and on the case of General Insurance Council & Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors., [2010 Cri. L.J.2883] to buttress his content













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top