SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 1912

ARUN BHANSALI
Heera – Appellant
Versus
Mangi Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:A.K. Rajvanshy, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Deelip Kawadia, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - This first appeal under Section 96 CPC is directed against judgment and decree dated 30.07.1996 passed by District Judge, Dungarpur, whereby, the suit filed by the respondent - Mangi Lal for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,37,616/- has been decreed along with interest @ 2% per month from the date of filing suit till payment.

2. The facts in brief may be noticed thus : plaintiff - Mangi Lal filed a suit, inter alia, with the averments that on 16.09.1991 defendants Heera and Chhabi Lal executed a promissory note and receipt jointly having received a sum of Rs. 80,000/- and agreed to pay interest @ 2% per month and, as the amount remained unpaid, after adding a sum of Rs. 57,600/- the present suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,37,616/- has been filed.

3. Written statements were filed by the defendants, inter alia, admitting that though pronote and receipt were executed on 16.09.1991 but no amount was paid; it was claimed that Panna Lal brother of Heera defendant No. 2 was to go to Kuwait for service and, therefore, a sum of Rs. 36,000/- as loan was taken on 11.12.1989 and documents were executed for a sum of Rs. 40,000/-; as Iraq attacked Kuwait resulting in difficult situatio















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top