SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Raj) 1792

AJAY RASTOGI
Pradeep Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Saransh Saini, Advocate.
For the Respondents: L.N. Boss, Addl. Govt. Counsel.

JUDGMENT

1. - Instant petition has been filed assailing the order inflicting penalty upon the petitioner of withholding of two grade increments with cumulative effect vide order dated 28.04.2007 in an enquiry initiated u/R.17 of the CCA Rules, 1958.

2. Counsel for petitioner submits that in the light of judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Krishna Dutta Sharma v. State of Rajasthan, [RLR 1987 (I)346] wherein it has been held that withholding of increment with cumulative effect is a major penalty which could have been inflicted only after holding enquiry u/R.16 of the CCA Rules,1958. In the instant case the penalty imposed upon the petitioner of withholding of two grade increments with cumulative effect being a major penalty could not have been inflicted upon without initiating inquiry u/R.16 of the CCA Rules,1958 and the order of inflicting penalty impugned herein is not sustainable and deserves to be quashed. He has further tried to persuade this Court that even on merits the allegations levelled against the petitioner are not sustainable and the finding recorded in the enquiry held u/R.17 is not tenable and that too deserves to be set aside.

3. Counsel for respondent s










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top