SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Raj) 1761

R.S.CHAUHAN
Nirmal Kodwani – Appellant
Versus
Krishan Gopal Verma – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Vishwajeet Mantri, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

1. - Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 26-5-2010, passed by Additional District Judge (Fast Track) No.3, Ajmer, Camp Kishangarh whereby the learned Judge has decreed the suit for recovery of Rs. 66,990/- in favour of the plaintiff-respondent, the defendant-appellant has challenged the same before this court.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Krishan Gopal Verma, the plaintiff-respondent, instituted a civil suit for recovery of Rs. 66,990/- against Nirmal Kodwani, the appellant, on the ground that the defendant had engaged services of plaintiff for videography and photography of the marriage of defendant's daughter, Pooja, which was solemnised in Delhi on 6-12-2005. According to the plaintiff he had raised two different bills, namely first one for Rs. 10,660/-, and second one for Rs. 48,285/-. Initially the defendant promised to pay the bills, but subsequently, he failed to do so. Therefore, on 25-6- 2007, the plaintiff sent a legal notice to the defendant. Since the defendant still did no pay the bills, the plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of the due amount.

3. The defendants-appellants filed written statement and denied the averments made in the plaint.







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top