1. - The petitioner appears to have been compelled to approach this Court in a matter which could be settled by State Government at its own on his representation having been made in compliance of order dated 12/09/2006 (Ann.8) of this Court in CWP-3768/98, but having been rejected without assigning reasons vide order dated 11/12/2007 (Ann.11).

2. To examine the controversy, it is relevant to jot down certain facts. Petitioner was appointed as Constable in Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service on 11/06/1965. However, criminal case (FIR-84/89) came to be registered at police station Civil Lines, Jaipur on 23/06/1989 against petitioner who happens to be father-in-law of complainant and other family members for offences Under Section 498-A and 406, IPC. Taking note of criminal case being registered (supra), disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him; however, on being held guilty of allegation of misconduct, was inflicted with a penalty of dismissal from service vide order dated 08/02/1991 - against which appeal U/r 23 of Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 ("CCA Rules") was preferred by petitioner and his appeal was allowed by appe