2014 Supreme(Raj) 1436
MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Ram Avtar Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
The Chief Manager (IR), SBBJ – Respondent
Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Ribhu Dutt, Advocate.
For the Respondent:M.D. Agarwal, Advocate.
JUDGMENT
1. - This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner Ram Avtar Gurjar,who has been working with the respondent as a Class-IV employee since 5.6.1999 seeking a direction to the respondent to regularise him in service and pay him regular salary of the post of Peon.
2. Facts of the case are that petitioner was appointed on the post of Class-IV on 5.7.1992 with the respondents. He worked with them upto 5.6.1999, when he was removed. Petitioner was initially paid Rs. 10 per day as daily wages, which was increased to Rs. 40/- in June, 1998. An industrial dispute was raised at the instance of the petitioner and referred to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Jaipur for adjudication on the terms whether the petitioner was in continuous service as claimed, under Section 25-B of the I.D. Act in the Tonk Branch of State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur Bank from 1992 to 1999. If yes, what relief, he is entitled to and from which date? The aforesaid reference was answered in affirmative in favour of petitioner-workman and it was held that he was in continuous service as defined under Section 25B of the ID Act in Tonk Branch at the relevant time and was entitled to
Click Here to Read the rest of this document