SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Raj) 1614

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Lala Ram Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Sandeep Taneja, Advocate.
For the Respondent: B.L. Awasthi, Addl. Govt. Counsel.

JUDGMENT

1. - This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-Lalit Sharma, aggrieved by the order dated 7.5.1996 by which penalty of reduction of his pay by five stages and retaining the same at the same level, till his retirement was awarded to him. Petitioner has also prayed for consequential benefits together with interest @ 24% per annum.

2. Petitioner was at the relevant time working as Agricultural Officer in the Agriculture Department of the Government of Rajasthan. The dispute pertains to the period when he was posted on deputation on the post of Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Tijara, District Alwar from 7.4.1982 to 9.8.1982 and a charge sheet under Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 was served on the petitioner on 13.11.1984 for certain financial irregularities. Nine witnesses were produced by the department, whereas petitioner apart from him, produced one Daulat Ram Jain as his witness. The enquiry officer concluded the enquiry and submitted report on 9.3.1988 in which he found charges no. 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 proved and charge no.3 party proved and charge no.5 not proved. The disciplinary authority accepting t














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top